National Accreditation & State Programs
Dickinson State University’s Teacher Education program is nationally accredited by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP). CAEP is recognized by the U.S. Department of Education and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation as the professional accrediting body for teacher preparation. CAEP advances excellence in educator preparation through evidence-based accreditation that assures quality and supports continuous improvement to strengthen P-12 student learning. More than 900 educator preparation providers participate in the CAEP accreditation system. The CAEP Standards for Accreditation of Educator Preparation focus on five areas:
- Content and Pedagogical Knowledge
- Clinical Partnerships and Practice
- Candidate Quality, Recruitment, and Selectivity
- Program Impact
- Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement
Programs reviewed by CAEP include:
- Biology Education
- Business Education
- Chemistry Education
- Choral Music Education
- Composite Music Education
- Composite Science Education (Earth Track and Biology Track)
- Composite Social Science Education
- English Education
- History Education
- Instrumental Music Education
- Mathematics Education
- Physical Education
- Master of Arts in Teaching (MAT)
Accreditation Visit
The Teacher Education program at Dickinson State University last hosted an accreditation visit by the Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP) in September 2018. The DSU Teacher Education program received full accreditation as well as a certificate of excellence for an exemplary site visit, which resulted in no stipulations and no AFI’s (areas for improvement). The next site visit from CAEP is scheduled for the fall of 2024. The core tenets of CAEP accreditation standards of excellence, recognize that:
- In CAEP's performance-based system, accreditation is based on evidence that demonstrates that teacher candidates know the subject matter and can teach it effectively so that students learn. In the CAEP system, EPPs must prove that candidates can connect theory to practice and be effective in an actual P-12 classroom.
- A professional education provider that is accredited by CAEP is expected to be involved in ongoing planning and evaluation; engaged in continuous assessment and development; ensure that faculty and programs reflect new knowledge, practice, and technologies; and be involved in continuous development in response to the evolving world of education and educational reform.
- Comments must address substantive matters related to the quality of professional education programs offered, and should specify the respondent's relationship, if any, to the institution (i.e., graduate, present or former faculty member, employer of graduates). Copies of all correspondence received will be sent to the university for comment prior to the review. No anonymous testimony will be considered.
Measure 1: Completer Effectiveness: Impact on P-12 Student Learning Growth
Each year, the ND Department of Public Instruction provides the EPP with data on the results of the North Dakota State Assessment in math and reading for students in North Dakota taught by Dickinson State University first year School of Education graduates.
- DSU First Year Teacher Effect on Student Outcomes 2018-19
- 2019-20 and 20-21 outcomes not available due to COVID.
- DSU First Year Teacher Effect on Student Outcomes 2021-22
- DSU First Year Teacher Effect on Student Outcomes 2022-23
Measure 2: Satisfaction of Employers and Stakeholder Involvement
The EPP sends out an employer satisfaction survey (SS) to administrators who have hired graduates from the DSU School of Education. This survey goes out at the end of each academic year to administrators who have hired completers from the previous year’s cohort.
- 2020-2021
- 2021-2022
- 2022-2023
The EPP has an advisory board consisting of shareholders from K-12 schools and DSU, including administrators, teachers, current School of Education candidates, and DSU School of Education faculty. The advisory board meets a minimum of twice per academic year.
Measure 3: Candidate Competency at Completion
In order to graduate, candidates are required to complete all licensure exams for their major field, including the PLT for the appropriate level and the content area PRAXIS exams before student teaching, complete a student teaching semester, maintain a 2.75 GPA, and complete a final portfolio presentation which addresses the 10 INTASC Standards, in addition to completing the required courses.
- Graduation Rates
- Program completers PRAXIS pass rates
- Student Teaching Data
- Completers Final GPA
- Final Portfolio Presentation Data
Measure 4: Ability of Completers to Be Hired in Education Positions for Which They Have Been Prepared
-
2020-21 completers- undergraduate, 83% obtained employment in education, 6% are in a graduate program, MAT, 100% obtained employment in education.
- 2021-22 completers- undergraduates, 85% obtained employment in education, 2.5% are in a graduate program; MAT, 25% obtained employment in education
- 2022-23 Completers- undergraduates, 90% obtained employment in education; MAT, 100% obtained employment in education.
Note: Employment data is self-reported by completers. If the completer indicated a position as a paraeducator or a long-term substitute, we do not count that as employment. We assume employment to mean full-time employment as a classroom teacher, resource room teacher, intervention teacher, or other similar teaching position.